| "Atypical"
blue nevus, "malignant" blue nevus, and "metastasizing" blue nevus: a
critique in historical perspective of three concepts flawed fatally.Am
J Dermatopathol. 2004 Oct;26(5):407-30.
The same errors that
spawned, sustained, and continue to spur the notions of "atypical" Spitz's
nevus, "malignant" Spitz's nevus, and "metastasizing" Spitz's nevus are
animating of 3 other concepts flawed equally, namely, those of "atypical
blue nevus," "malignant blue nevus," and "metastasizing blue nevus." Our
intention here is to compel to the conclusion, by way of critique in
historical perspective, that all neoplasms claimed to be "malignant blue
nevus" and "metastasizing blue nevus;" in fact, are melanomas, that all
"atypical blue nevi" are either a nevus or a melanoma, and that the trio of
curious designations that serve as title of this work are mere evasions
transparently from a diagnosis, straightforwardly, of 1 of only 3
possibilities, to wit, "blue nevus," melanoma, or melanoma in association
with a "blue nevus." Rather than admit uncertainty forthrightly, those who
employ circumlocutions that we deplore, such as those under scrutiny here,
resort to linguistic maneuvers that, at first blush, seem to have the cachet
of scholarship (the jargon used being in keeping with a slew of other
well-accepted, but equally bogus diagnoses in [dermato]pathology, among
those being "minimal deviation melanoma," "borderline melanoma," "nevoid
melanoma," "potentially low-grade melanocytic neoplasm," and "melanocytic
proliferation of uncertain biologic potential"). All those terms and phrases
are constructed in a manner designed to make them appear to convey unbridled
confidence on the part of a histopathologist, rather than what they are in
actuality, that is, a cover abjectly for tentativeness. Scrutiny of the
lingo, in very abbreviated form, just catalogued reveals it to be devoid of
content utterly. For example, "malignant blue nevus" and
"metastasizing blue
nevus" not only are contradictions in terms, but they are outrageous
violations of principles fundamental to classic Virchowian pathology. We
seek here to debunk that claptrap in the same manner we did "atypical
Spitz's nevus," "malignant Spitz's nevus," and "metastasizing Spitz's
nevus." It is our hope that readers will consider our arguments worthy
because they are logical, will find them convincing because they are
irrefutable, and will incorporate the lessons communicated through them so
that their own professional life, pathology as a discipline, and,
ultimately, patients, are the beneficiaries.
Congenital pauci-melanotic
cellular blue nevus.J
Cutan Pathol. 2004 Apr;31(4):312-7.
Unusual or atypical
melanocytic nevi can be confused with malignant melanoma. Two patients are
presented here with a rare variant of melanocytic nevus. Both were men. One
was 39 years old and sought medical attention after trauma of a "congenital
mole". The other was 24 years old and presented with a history of a slowly
growing lesion, which had been known since childhood. In both patients, the
lesion occurred on the buttock. They were dermal and superficial
subcutaneous nodules measuring 1.5 and 2.3 cm in greatest dimension,
respectively. The tumors were composed of densely cellular fascicles of
melanocytes arranged in a lobulated growth pattern. Rare nests of small
epithelioid melanocytes were also seen. No melanin pigment was seen on
hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections. Focal minimal pigment was noted by
Fontana-Masson stain in one case. Involvement of numerous peripheral nerve
trunks by fusiform melanocytes was a prominent feature. Rare mitotic figures
were seen in melanocytes [1-2 mitoses per 50 high-power fields (HPF)]. The
MIB-1 labeling index was low (less than 5% of the lesional cell population
was immunopositive). Both tumors were excised with negative surgical
margins. One patient underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy because there was
controversy regarding the biologic potential of the lesion. No melanocytic
tumor deposits were found in the lymph nodes. On clinical follow up of 11
years and 18 months after complete excision, both patients are alive and
well with no evidence of recurrence. We regard these lesions as congenital
monophasic and pauci-melanotic variants of cellular blue nevus. The nevi are
presented here to enhance our knowledge of the morphologic spectrum of
melanocytic tumors and to help avoid confusion with malignant melanoma. |